On Bumps and Tebows
        Repy to article on Politics Daily by Lizzie Skurnick, February 8, 2010
         
        Liz,
        So the “bump” is maybe why no one in the liberal community  would question why two lesbian women were allowed to create disabled children  back in 2002, their purposely finding a sperm donor who had at least three  generations of the disability in his family?  
        To briefly summarize, two American, deaf lesbian women  created two handicapped children to raise for their personal enjoyment, the  children purposely planned from day one to be created to be just as disabled as  they were.  
        The first child was reported to have been born deaf to the  point of using hand signs, (praise the pagan gods), while the second was only  partially deaf (bummer.)  This is what  you get, Liz, in your diversity society, where diversity means "We do what we  want while you shut up about it."  
        Gee, I seem to remember just reading something like that in  your column.  
        These women, in essence, created designer children for their  personal pleasure as if almost off the shelf at a local Nordstroms.  Yet no one in your liberal progressive media  nor any gay group was reported to challenge the morals of these women creating  human beings as if pets, those “bumps” that no one wanted to discuss back in  2002. 
        But then with moving on to your quote about Planned  Parenthood “wisely answering” the Tebow ad in the 2010 Superbowl, I have to  say, “I don't think so.”  
        First, the ad used two black athletes to talk about how  important it was to stand by your child while on the other hand they  promoted a woman’s choice to not stand by your child.   This was laughable since Margaret Sanger saw black children as if  useless human beings.  
        And you should know more and more black ministers are tired  of the double standard, seeing Sanger and her Planned Parenthood organization supporting a holocaust against the black race.  
        Planned Parenthood would be quick to defend their abortion  mill of black babies, telling you that if these black women, who aborted their  children, had kept them the children would have probably gone to jail, which is  exactly what Margaret Sanger would have said.   
        So where did the Morgan Freeman’s or Lt. Col Allen West’s of the world  come from, Planned Parenthood seeing no chance these aborted babies would ever grow up to be like them?
        In other words, Planned Parenthood never wanted to see what  the potentials of the black children they aborted could be, as Pam Tebow and her  husband had seen for their son, Tim.  
        And that's the ugly bottom line!
        It's why Planned Parenthood is called an abortion mill and  why Barack Obama, who has openly supported the mission of its founder, Margaret  Sanger, is out of touch with some in his own race, not surprisingly since he  was raised in African and in a strong Muslim environment.  
        And his acceptance of Jesus was from the Christ of the Black  Value System of listening to Reverend Wright’s teachings for 20 years, a  religion based on Ethiopian colonialism by whites.   His Christ is going to come back to avenge the blacks, not save  them from their sins.  And I have heard  that at least one college has a PhD course on this Ethiopian subject under the  heading of Christianity. (Read the following article to understand why Reverend Wright has focused on this country.) 
        Finally, you seem to have forgotten that Planned Parenthood  on several recent occasions had openly called the supporters of the Tebow  Superbowl ad, Focus and the Family, a hate organization, Planned Parenthood  unbelievably NEVER having seen the ad they were attacking!  Well, the Tebow ad turned out to not be an  anti-abortion ad at all, the vile feminists who run Planned Parenthood caught  being the 24/7 haters, not Focus on the Family. 
        Oh, by the way, if you listened to Mrs. Tebow's story run on  Focus on the Family's Web site, you will discover the doctors in the  Philippines had thought Mrs. Tebow had a tumor growing in her womb, not a baby.  
        But the father had prayed for a strong preacher to be born  into the family, the Tebow’s amazingly spiritual belief telling them it was not  a tumor but a child inside that “bump.”   And that is the real story behind the Tebow ad, one of faith and love of  child, not the antithesis of Planned Parenthood, an org that holds meetings  with porn providers.  
        In the end remembering that I live in America and not in  China, I would rather have Mrs. Tebow as a role model than those two lesbian  mothers who created two designer babies for their personal enjoyment, not  seeming to care about how the humans they had created would feel about what had  been done to them long after their selfish mothers had died.  
        It is the kind of world you get when the best view on life  you can come up with is found in something like the Vagina Monologues.   Wow, don’t you just shiver from the inspiration? 
        Source of Article: Politics Daily
         
        Life Education And Resource Network (LEARN)
        