| Beware of the Ides of March from the Content Children of AOL 
              
                | If you are an AOL member and have trouble posting conservative comments on AOL, or think your comments are being posted but haven't realized they're instead being scrubbed by the Content Children of AOL, you may have been Stupaked! |  The attempted upload to AOL, as shown below, officially went to where progressives send all comments they love to hate; virtual limbo. That is very troubling for an AOL subscriber who has been with the service for over 15 years when I had simply wanted a reliable ISP. I have also discovered this is not the first upload to go into limbo, with AOL's newer Content Children trying to silence free speech. Need proof?  Note the top graphic that proves I was logged in to AOL on this date, which can be seen by the drop-down menu that is providing me the option to "logout." But then note the graphic that is below, claiming I am not logged in, but logged out. The upload I had pasted into the box is now gone, with the box obviously blank, meaning it will never be sent according to AOL until I log in, which I can't because I am.  And AOL's response? Well, I don't know. When sending a complaint to AOL CEO Armstrong's Marxist / socialist Content Children last week, they somehow never got back to me. Hmm.  Below is a news story that was posted today by AOL's Content Children along with my upload that wouldn't . . couldn't . . . shouldn't?  Maybe you might want to pass this around before the election of a salt and pepper president that had spewed all that hope and change over the last four despicable years.  
              
                | 
                  AOL Content Children's Post Libya Attack: Clinton Claims Responsibility For Libya Consulate Security 
                    My attempted upload to AOL / HuffPo today, complaining of the biased copy: 
                      What?!  HuffPo's  Content Children posted, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton  is answering Republican criticism of the Obama administration's handling . .  .  First, Hillary takes the fall while Obama doesn't have the  gonads to take the responsibly, while he had allowed another woman, Susan Rice,  to protect his sorry derrière with lies passed onto most media outlets?   Then HuffPo writes, "Republican criticism,” therefore  believing that ALL Democrats shouldn't care about the handling of the murders of  four Americans, one sodomized in some kind of religious act of owning an  enemy’s body? Obama acts like the child he is, caught with his hand in the  cookie jar crying, “Mommy, I did’t know that jar was up there on the counter,”  in other words thinking Benghazi was  a safe resort on the Black Sea.  Any  decent leader would have asked their State Department, “Is there something I  should know?”  But not this rock star,  being whisked around to fund raisers. And who camped out on the lawn of Karl Rove during the Bush  administration, yet when four Americans die they’re absent sucking their  latte’s while surrounding their wagons around “Snakes and Company?”  And the New York Times . . . OMG the cowards over the New York Times.  Just when Marxists need help, the New York  Times is there watching Hillary pushed down the Obama slide and into the  stinking sand of Obama's personal playground.   (Attempted upload 1:20 P.M., October 16, 2012.) Webmaster |  |