"Freedom House puts out  an index rating countries as free or partly free or not free based on whether  their citizens have certain rights most Americans consider fundamental.
                      If  Freedom House expanded the list to colleges, where would Harvard rank?
                        Surely  not 'free.'
                      Freedom  of association is gone. Harvard College now has a policy in place to start  punishing students who want to be members of a single-sex organization – even  if the organization isn’t affiliated with the college.
                      Now  freedom of religion is on the chopping block.
                      A Christian fellowship was put on probation last week for forcing a junior who  served as an assistant Bible course officer to resign because she embraced  homosexuality, according to The Harvard Crimson.
                      The  student leaders of the group, Harvard College Faith and Action, say they asked  her to step down because of a 'theological disagreement.' 
                      But college officials  say the group violated the college’s student handbook, which says student  organizations can’t “discriminate on the basis of … sexual orientation.”
                      The  Christian fellowship didn’t do that. Nor is it a disputed fact, as the Crimson story makes clear:
                      
                        'The  woman, as well as four other members of HCFA, said they believe she was not  asked to step down from her position because she is bisexual. Instead, HCFA  leadership pressured her to resign because she chose to actively pursue a  same-sex relationship, according to the woman and the four other individuals.'
                      
                      In  other words, Christians who belong to a Christian group told someone no longer  living in a Christian way she could no longer have a leadership role in their  group. And  for that, the group got suspended.
                      The technical term for what the Christian group did is  Christianity. The technical term for what the college  did is persecution.
                      Oh, there’s a little more to the story.  But not much. The college officials also cited the student group’s ties to  Christian Union, a national evangelical Protestant organization that provides  money and support staff for student groups at Harvard and elsewhere.
                      A Christian Union staff member got  involved in trying to resolve the bisexual student’s association with the  student group, according to the Crimson story, which  apparently troubles college officials.
                      Presumably we can expect an audit of  the financial and administrative ties between left-wing groups on campus and  national organizations? Or would it be better to just let  left-wing groups and right-wing groups and no-wing groups figure out their own  structure and whom they associate with and how?
                      Not cited in the college’s suspension,  but surely the proximate cause of it, is Harvard Christian Faith and Action’s  hosting last week of a Christian speaker who describes herself as an ex-lesbian  and advocates that people who feel same-sex attraction not act on it out of  love for God.
                      In other words:  She made a  pitch for Christian sexual morality. Five days later, the group that sponsored  her got put on probation. So much for freedom of speech.
                      Now Harvard, as a private institution,  has a right to be as restrictive as any other private organization about who  gets its rights and privileges. But what is all this business in the student handbook about 'free expression,' 'free inquiry,'  'intellectual honesty'? 
                      How about the part that says 'Any form of discrimination based on …  religion … is contrary to the principles and policies of Harvard University'?
                      Freedom of religion is not the freedom  to believe anything you want. No one can regulate what someone believes. It’s the right to practice a religion.  That’s what the leaders of Harvard Christian Faith and Action are doing. By  insisting the group’s representatives try to live by Christian morals, Harvard  Christian Faith and Action leaders are living their faith. To punish them is to  discriminate against them – and all the group’s members – based on their  religion.
                      It’s one thing to reject Christianity,  as many students and the vast majority of faculty members and administrators do  these days. That’s their right. It’s another thing to reject  Christians.
                      Or can’t college officials tell the  difference?
                      At Harvard, if Christianity is a sin,  college officials are acting as though they hate both the sin and the sinner. They don’t appear to think much of  freedom, either.