"When global warming campaigners misled people  about the status of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, Dr. Peter Ridd of James  Cook University spoke up.
              
              He engaged in such over-the-top conduct as sharing  pictures of areas of the reef that had been deemed dead, but were in fact  experiencing "spectacular coral growth," and postulating that the  coral had died and regrown following natural cyclones in ways it has for ages  past. 
              
              Temporary coral bleaching, not an indictment of  human civilization and its CO2 emissions?  Heresy!
              
              What was Dr. Ridd's reward for raising important  scientific questions and attempting to correct the record about the reef?
            
              He was censured, censored, and sacked!
            
            Think of the chilling impact the university's  effort to destroy a scientist's career for speaking out had, not only on Dr.  Ridd, but on all researchers at James Cook or any place of learning.  The  message was clear: 
            
              "Shut up, toe the party line, or out you  go." 
            
            How many researchers labor in silence, escape to other work, or  mouth what their intellect tells them is rank PC dogma from fear of being  treated like Peter Ridd?
              
              If unvetted academic group think is what you want,  this is how you get it. Unlike so many of his colleagues, Dr. Ridd fought  back and won.  Resoundingly.
              
              Read the judge's full decision at  CFACT.org.  You'll find it very interesting and highly  instructive.  It's a good read. Here's a sample: 
            
              'At its core, intellectual  freedom mandates that academics should express their opinions openly and  honestly, while inviting scrutiny and debate about those ideas. Unless opinions  are expressed in this way, the growth and expression of ideas will be stifled  and new realms of thinking will cease to be explored. That will lead to  intellectual and social stagnation and a uniformity of thought which is an  anathema to the concept of higher learning and social progress.
                
                    Intellectual freedom allows academics to challenge the status quo and  encourage critical analysis.
                
                  During the last 160 years,  arguably the two most prominent scientists/academics to challenge the status  quo have been Charles Darwin and Albert Einstein. The ideas brought forth by  both of these men were extremely controversial and offended several of their  academic peers as well as many others in the greater society. That is how it  should be and without intellectual freedom, the world would have been denied  the benefit of ground-breaking thought and intellectual risk taking of the sort  that encourages innovation and other scholastic enquiries.'
            
            Judge Salvatore Vasta ultimately rooted his  opinion not in general principles of academic freedom, but rather in James Cook  University's specific policy guaranteeing academic freedom to its  employees.  
            Judge Vasta found that the university violated Dr. Ridd's  specifically codified academic rights 28 times and ruled each and every  violation to have been unlawful.
              
              CFACT's close friend JoAnne Nova summed it up well:
            
              Brilliant. There is  still some free speech in Australia, as long as you are willing to risk your  career, 12 months out of action and a huge legal case. Peter Ridd wins on all  counts. 
              Presumably James Cook will have to  reinstate him, and he is now free to talk about the failure of replication in  science and how our institutions may not be trusted. How many taxpayer dollars  were fritzed defending the indefendable? Will Ridd get compensation? Will JCU  staff get punished or sacked for what their war against science? 
              Thanks to Peter for fighting on when so many  would have given up.
            
            Dr. Peter Ridd's resounding legal victory is  brilliant indeed.  He stands completely vindicated.  James Cook University slouches in shame."
              
              For nature and people too,
            Craig Rucker; President and Co-Founder, Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT)